<\/p>\n
\n It comes after the British Retail Consortium (BRC) criticised the prospect of being asked to limit the price of products such as eggs, bread and milk in return for the lifting of some regulations.\n<\/p>\n
\n Treasury minister Dan Tomlinson said, \u201cthis isn\u2019t something we\u2019re looking at,\u201d when asked whether there had been any conversations with supermarkets about introducing price caps.\n<\/p>\n
\n He told Sky News:<\/a> \u201cThe Government is not looking at doing this.\n<\/p>\n \n \u201cInstead, what we\u2019re doing is looking across the economy at what are the different ways that we can help households.\u201d\n<\/p>\n \n The Financial Times reported that the Treasury had spoken to supermarkets about offering \u201cincentives\u201d which may include easing packaging policies and delay potentially costly changes to healthy food rules.\n<\/p>\n \n Helen Dickinson, the chief executive of the BRC, the leading trade association for retailers, said: \u201cRather than introduce 1970s style price controls and trying to force retailers to sell goods at a loss, the Government must focus on how it will reduce the public policy costs which are pushing up food prices in the first place.\u201d\n<\/p>\n \n She added: \u201cThe challenge facing retailers is a combination of higher energy and commodity costs resulting from the Middle East conflict, and the soaring cost of the Government\u2019s domestic policies.\u201d\n<\/p>\n \n A food price cap risks one thing: fewer goods on supermarket shelves, not lower bills. When you interfere with markets, you don\u2019t beat inflation – you squeeze supply, and simply push up prices elsewhere.<\/p>\n I spoke to @thetimes<\/a> https:\/\/t.co\/CL1qUHC6rD<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/CaBJJwbNqM<\/a>\n <\/p>\n\n