In a new health advisory, the CDC raised the alarm over a surge in rabies cases. The virus is almost always fatal once symptoms begin.
All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Martyn Jones.
Officials are warning of the spread of an outbreak of deadly bacteria linked to contaminated broccoli sprouts.
Idaho-based Evergreen Fresh Sprouts LLC announced Thursday it is voluntarily recalling 215 cases of broccoli sprouts because they may be contaminated with salmonella bovismorbificans, a type of bacteria that causes bloody diarrhea.
The affected cases, which had six 4oz bags in each, were distributed to food co-ops, restaurants, food service customers and grocery stores in Washington state, Montana and Idaho.
The products are packaged in plastic bags or plastic clamshell containers with expiration dates of September 7, September 9, September 11, September 14 and September 16.
According to the latest figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 22 people have been sickened in Washington, Montana, Idaho and Utah. There have also been two hospitalizations but no deaths reported.
FDA officials also note the contaminated products may have reached other states as well.
The recall has not been classified, though – given previous similar recalls – it may be given a Class I designation, which represents ‘a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.’
While most people recover from salmonella on their own, vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly and immunocompromised individuals may be at risk of several complications such as infections and organ damage.
Broccoli sprouts have been recalled as they may be contaminated with salmonella (stock image)
The FDA urged consumers, restaurants and retailers to not eat, serve or sell the recalled broccoli sprouts.
Customers who purchased or received the sprouts should carefully clean and sanitize any surfaces or containers that they touched to reduce the spread of salmonella, the FDA said.
A total of 22 illnesses have been reported to the CDC, though the agency notes more recent illnesses may not yet be reported, as it takes three to four weeks to determine if a sick individual is part of an outbreak.
The true toll is also likely higher because many people recover without seeking medical care or testing.
According to the CDC, illnesses tied to the outbreak began July 7 and continued through August 26.
Of those, all 19 of those interviewed by state and local public health officials confirmed eating sprouts before becoming ill. All but two of the same group said they specifically ate broccoli sprouts.
Washington reported the highest number of illnesses at 16. There were four people sickened in Montana, one in Idaho and one in Utah. The two hospitalized individuals both live in Washington.
On September 2, the Washington State Department of Health announced it was investigating a salmonella outbreak after 13 residents reported becoming ill after eating the company’s sprouts between July 7 and July 18.
The following day, the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services announced its own investigation after two people became ill.
Evergreen Fresh Sprouts recalled its broccoli sprouts based on a positive salmonella test result from a sample analyzed by Montana officials, according to the FDA.
Salmonella bovismorbificans is a strain of salmonella that can cause diarrhea, fever, stomach cramps and dehydration – symptoms that require medical attention, particularly for children under five, adults over 65 and those with weakened immune systems.
Pictured above is a package of the recalled broccoli sprouts
The above CDC map shows states where illnesses related to the outbreak have been reported. Most of the illnesses (16) were in Washington
The CDC estimates that salmonella causes approximately 1.3 million infections, 26,500 hospitalizations and 420 deaths in the US each year.
While most cases resolve with supportive care, primarily hydration and rest, the bacteria’s ability to survive stomach acid and invade intestinal cells makes it a powerful pathogen.
In severe cases, the infection can escalate beyond the gastrointestinal tract.
When salmonella enters the bloodstream, a condition known as bacteremia, it can travel to other parts of the body and cause secondary infections.
These can include endocarditis, or infection of the heart valves; osteomyelitis, or bone infection; meningitis, or an infection of the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord; or septic arthritis, a joint infection.
These invasive infections are particularly dangerous and require prompt treatment with antibiotics, often administered intravenously in a hospital setting.
Invasive salmonellosis can also lead to long-term complications, even after the initial infection resolves.
Some people develop reactive arthritis, a condition characterized by joint pain, eye inflammation and painful urination that can persist for months or even years.
Others may experience post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome, with chronic digestive issues stemming from the damage the bacteria caused to the intestinal lining during the acute phase of illness.
Salmonella is resilient. It can survive on surfaces for weeks and is resistant to certain environmental stresses, making it difficult to eliminate completely from food manufacturing facilities.
Because contaminated foods look, smell and taste completely normal, the only way to protect consumers is to remove them from the supply chain before they can be eaten.
The cases come amid a nationwide recall of jalapenos that were contaminated with salmonella. As of August 21, there have been 431 cases and 57 hospitalizations across 32 states in that recall.
Deadly prostate cancers could be caught sooner after researchers discovered telltale genetic ‘footprints’ behind almost nine in ten tumours.
Experts described the findings as ‘hugely exciting’, saying the discovery could one day lead to men being offered more personalised treatment.
The new study, published in the journal Nature, saw scientists examine tumour samples of 959 men.
They identified eight distinct genetic ‘footprints’ that account for around 85 per cent of prostate cancers.
And four of these were linked to cancers that were more likely to spread outside of the prostate.
Experts said these ‘important new clues’ about the biological mechanisms behind the disease could lead to developments for better tests and earlier identification of high-risk cancers.
The new study, from the Pan Prostate Cancer Group (PPCG), a global collaborative, also found other footprints were linked to age and ancestry, including patterns that were more common in black men.
Ros Eeles, professor of oncogenetics at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and co-founder of the PPCG, said: ‘For many years we’ve known that prostate cancer is not a single disease.
Scientists identified eight distinct genetic ‘footprints’ that account for around 85 per cent of prostate cancers
‘Two men may receive the same diagnosis but have cancers that develop and behave very differently, and we have not fully understood the biology behind those differences.
‘Some of these findings are helping us understand aggressive disease, while others are revealing entirely new avenues for research.
‘Most importantly, this work brings us closer to identifying distinct molecular forms of prostate cancer.
‘Our long-term goal is to help ensure that patients receive the right treatment at the right time, based on the biology of their individual cancer rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.’
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in Britain, with 63,000 cases and 12,000 deaths every year – one every 45 minutes.
Many are diagnosed too late for treatment to succeed.
Black men face a one in four lifetime risk, double that of the general population, and men whose fathers or brothers have had the disease face a similar threat.
The Daily Mail is campaigning to end needless prostate cancer deaths and for a national prostate cancer screening programme, initially targeted at high-risk men, such as those who are black, have a family history of the disease or specific genetic mutations.
Colin Cooper, professor of cancer genetics at the University of East Anglia and co-founder of the PPCG, said: ‘The scale of collaboration has helped uncover important new clues about the biological processes that drive prostate cancer and why some forms are more aggressive than others.
‘Taken together, these findings are helping us build a much clearer picture of why some cancers remain slow growing while others become life-threatening.
‘Ultimately, we hope this knowledge will lead to better tests, earlier identification of high-risk cancers and more personalised care, so that more patients receive the right treatment at the right time.’
Lead author of the new study, Professor Joachim Weischenfeldt, from the University of Copenhagen, added: ‘It is remarkable how much clinical significance these genetic fingerprints appear to have.
‘They can help distinguish between patients who are developing life-threatening cancer and those who are not.
‘While further clinical studies are needed before these findings can be used in patient care, they bring us a step closer to understanding the biology that drives aggressive prostate cancer and to delivering more personalised treatment for patients.’
Dr Hayley Luxton, from the charity Prostate Cancer UK, which co-funded the study, said: ‘At the moment, it’s not obvious which prostate cancers are more likely to spread outside the prostate, which makes it harder for men to receive the best treatment for their individual cancer.
‘These findings from the Pan Prostate Cancer Group are hugely exciting and could lead to men getting the personalised treatment they need for their prostate cancer.’
Famously, mackerel is considered one of the healthiest fish you can eat because it’s packed with brain-boosting omega-3s.
But an investigation has revealed that many tinned ‘mackerel’ products, stocked by the likes of Sainsbury’s, Lidl and Tesco no longer contain any of the oily fish.
Tinned fish supergiant Princes switched its branded mackerel range to Chilean jack mackerel last year – which, despite having a similar name, is an entirely different fish.
Yet UK retailers continue to sell ‘jack mackerel’ products alongside traditional mackerel, under signs that conflate the two very different products.
Jack mackerel belongs to the Carangidae family, while true mackerel belongs to the Scombridae family.
But the real clencher for health-conscious consumers is the nutritional quality. Prince’s jack mackerel contains half as much omega-3 as true mackerel.
‘Tinned fish is an affordable and convenient way for households to add important nutrients to their diets and eat the recommended two portions of fish a week, one of which should be oily.
‘It’s a real concern when manufacturers quietly downgrade everyday staples like these as shoppers can end up paying the same price for a product that delivers significantly less nutritional value,’ Sue Davies, Which? head of food policy said.
UK canned ‘mackerel’ now contains no mackerel
Omega-3 fatty acids are essential for everything from heart health – helping to remove harmful fats from the blood while increasing levels of good cholesterol – to dementia prevention.
One study found that people who regularly eat oily fish have healthier blood vessels and lower blood pressure, which may help protect against dementia.
Another found that those who have higher levels of omega-3 in their blood perform better on thinking tests.
Among oily fish, mackerel provides one of the richest sources of omega-3 per 100g, ahead of salmon and sardines.
Demand for tinned fish has soared over the last two years, with sales up nearly a fifth – as health-conscious consumers look to make money-savvy choices.
But consumers have started to notice the difference, complaining about changes in taste and texture, including less oily fish.
‘It smells rather metallic…like cheap rubbish tuna,’ canned seafood reviewer Marcus Ansell said in a recent video posted to his 650,000 Instagram followers.
The swap was largely pushed by concerns over sustainability, with Waitrose halting sales of fresh, chilled and frozen true mackerel in April, over overfishing concerns.
Critics say consumers are getting less healthful benefits without knowing it
Canned products are gradually being phased out as stocks last.
Lidl, meanwhile, has been transitioning to sustainably sourced Chilean jack mackerel – which it sells under supermarket signs that simply read ‘mackerel in olive oil’.
And despite ‘jack mackerel’ being roughly a third cheaper than true mackerel, food giants like Tesco continue to sell the substitute fish at similar prices, with a discrepancy of just 20p.
The mackerel catch in the North East Atlantic has remained 39 per cent higher than the limit advised by scientists for over 15 years.
The fishery no longer owns a Marine Stewardship Council certification, a sustainability badge required by many major retailers.
Chilean jack mackerel, however, is certified.
Until last year, the faux-mackerel was not allowed to be labelled ‘jack mackerel’, but weeks after Princes launched its new tins, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs changed its rules to permit the new labelling.
But the move has sparked outrage among critics, who say the new rules blur the distinction between true mackerel and jack mackerel, potentially catfishing consumers
‘Consumers will be suffering because pure mackerel is a much better species to eat than jack mackerel,’ Stewart Harper, former managing director of North Atlantic Fishing Company, told the Financial Times.
It’s one of the most common ailments that makes even the smallest of movements agonising.
Frozen shoulder – when the tissue around the joint becomes inflamed and shrinks – happens to at least one in 20 people, causing pain, tightness and hugely restricted movement.
Other than physiotherapy to loosen the tight tissue, there’s little that many GPs can do to help – prompting many to turn to ‘natural’ and experimental remedies, such as supplements.
Recent research suggests there may be a benefit. A study published last year by Indian scientists found a curious link between both frozen shoulder and back pain, and the so-called sunshine pill, vitamin D.
Scientists analysed medical reports of more than 5,000 people and found that those who are deficient in the nutrient are far more likely to suffer the condition.
Experts suggested that low levels of the vitamin can trigger the release of cells that promote inflammation, worsening pain and stiffness.
So should those blighted by frozen shoulder start popping daily vitamin D? And will other supplements help too?
Here, top experts reveal the capsules they’d pick for common aches and pains, the ones that don’t work, and other remedies that are always worth trying.
The UK supplement industry is valued between £3.6 billion and £4.8 billion
Vitamin D could help frozen shoulder…turmeric won’t
There is growing evidence that conditions like frozen shoulder and chronic back pain are a result of inflammation within the body – which is worsened by several nutrient deficiencies.
Low levels of magnesium, B vitamins, as well as vitamin D, have been found to increase the risk of musculoskeletal problems.
In 2024, experts at the Rothman Orthopaedic Institute in Florida examined several studies on the topic and concluded that vitamin D has anti-inflammatory effects, influences muscle function and tissue healing.
‘Correcting deficiency’ – which is suffered by around one in five Britons – could therefore be an effective treatment for shoulder problems, they concluded.
However, physiotherapist Sammy Margot is clear that any potential benefit would likely only be seen in those with a deficiency.
‘Ensuring you have enough vitamin D matters for anyone with a musculoskeletal problem,’ she says, adding that this won’t necessarily be an instant pain reliever.
Meanwhile, research into the healing power of other supplements for frozen shoulder is ‘lacking and inconsistent’, she says.
She adds that many patients are convinced that supplements like turmeric – known for anti-inflammatory properties – help reduce symptoms.
‘But as I’m aware, there’s no specific trials showing that turmeric or its active ingredient, curcumin, is effective for frozen shoulder.
‘Most of the research into curcumin and joint pain involves knee osteoarthritis, which is an entirely different condition. And even there the evidence is inconsistent.’
Frozen shoulder is one of the most common ailements, affecting one on 20 Britons
So what does work?
Ms Margot recommends steroid injections, which work by delivering anti-inflammatory medicine into the shoulder joint to ease pain and swelling, and can be delivered by specialist clinics and some GPs.
However, the level of success will depend on the stage at which you have the treatment, she says.
‘There’s much stronger evidence for corticosteroid injections if they’re performed during the early, more painful stage.’
Once that acute pain begins to settle, mobility exercises and stretching become increasingly important for restoring movement,’ she adds.
Some specialists recommend combining an injection with physiotherapy as combined they may provide greater improvement.
Doing nothing is also an option as a frozen shoulder often eventually resolves itself.
But Ms Margot says this could take up to three years. ‘Intervention isn’t just about comfort, it’s about not losing years of shoulder function.’
Omega-3 and a turmeric combo are worth a try for a painful back
Back pain is one of the most common reasons people reach for painkillers, supplements and alternative remedies – affecting around 80 per cent of Britons at some point in their life.
Some supplements could ‘play a role’ in improving symptoms, according to Margot.
Turmeric, which contains anti-inflammatory curcumin, could be useful for a bad back.
A high quality trial published last year in the journal Sage found that a single dose of high-strength turmeric – combined with a herb called boswellia – significantly reduced back pain in 90 per cent of people studied within four hours.
Other studies have found similar results in those taking turmeric for a 90-day period, with patients reporting a reduction in disability and blood tests showing fewer inflammatory markers.
There’s also evidence it could help knee problems. A 2025 analysis of 17 trials found turmeric reduced pain in people with knee osteoarthritis, compared to a placebo.
The evidence is ‘more promising than that concerning other supplements’, says Margot, adding that the benefits are likely to be ‘modest’.
Physiotherapist Sammy Margot says there are a handful of supplements she may recommend, depending on the patient
Curcumin should therefore be considered an add-on rather than a replacement for established treatment.
Omega-3 supplements may also have a role, she adds, although the strongest case is for people who eat little oily fish or those with an inflammatory form of arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis.
While magnesium has become hugely fashionable for everything from muscle aches to sleep, Ms Margot says there is very little research showing it improves back pain.
Instead, the evidence points to assisting with cramps.
Back pain, she explains, can be caused by a range of problems, meaning, in many cases, an extra dose of an important nutrient might be irrelevant.
‘There are problems involving discs, joints or muscles, irritation of a nerve root, deconditioning, or sometimes have no obvious structural cause at all,’ she says. ‘Each may require a different approach.
‘That’s why a supplement claim that lumps all of that together is unlikely to work as trials tend to look at specific problems.’
For most people wanting to recover from common muscle soreness, less glamorous basics have far stronger evidence, according to Margot.
For instance, getting sufficient sleep, consuming adequate protein to help muscles repair and grow, and gradually building strength and fitness.
Investing in a resistance band, a single session with a physiotherapist to get a tailored exercise plan, or a decent pair of supportive shoes, are all evidence-based recommendations, she says.
‘Supplements may sometimes produce modest improvements in pain.
‘But they cannot restore range of movement, strengthen muscles, or address what caused the pain in the first place.’
Eyelash extensions could leave you with an unpleasant infestation of mites that burrow into the lash line and distort vision.
Research has found that 96 per cent of those who regularly undergo the beauty treatment are blighted by the microscopic creepy crawlies.
The mites, medically known as demodex, feed off the dead skin cells that collect in the dried glue used to attach the synthetic hair, causing the bugs to breed rapidly.
The extensions can also ‘trap’ dead mites, stopping them from naturally shedding.
Doctors have warned that the unpleasant problem can have potentially serious consequences, including itchy, scaly skin and blurred vision.
Around 129,000 eyelash procedures are carried out every week in the UK. In extension treatments beauticians glue strands of synthetic fibres to the eyelids, making the lashes appear fuller and longer.
Treatments cost anywhere from £40 to £150.
Eye doctors found 96 per cent of women who have the beauty procedure every three to four weeks were crawling with mites
The mites, known as demodex folliculorum, irritate follicles and block oil-producing glands, triggering a painful reaction known as demodicosis
But now, ophthalmologists have warned of ‘growing evidence’ the procedure ‘may create problems’.
Experts from the National Pirogov Memorial Medical University in Ukraine presented compelling evidence of harm at the 44th Congress of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
The research, conducted by ophthalmologist Dr Tetiana Zhmud and her team, involved surveying 345 women aged between 16 and 28 to ask how often they had eyelash extensions.
Half of the women said they had the procedure every three to four weeks – the equivalent to around 17 times per year.
Some 48 per cent said they suffered with a form of discomfort, redness or itching afterwards.
To analyse these reports in greater detail, researchers used a technique called meibography – using infrared light to analyse the glands beneath the eyelids.
The test showed that 85 per cent of women who’d had eyelash extensions at least ten times had glands that were blocked or not producing enough oil to keep eyes hydrated.
The team then used a microscope to analyse samples of eyelashes from 25 women who regularly had the procedure.
They found the mites in 24 of them, equating to 96 per cent. Meanwhile, 18 of the women also showed signs of itching, irritation, redness, swelling, scaly skin and sticky eyelashes.
Dr Tetiana Zhmud, an ophthalmologist at the National Pirogov Memorial Medical University in Ukraine, led and presented the research
While demodex mites are very common in adults, they usually shed naturally and do not cause harm.
But when they accumulate excessively – usually because they get trapped in debris or proliferate unusually – they can trigger painful eye infections.
Experts added that, as well as causing the problem, eyelash extensions can also make the parasitic mites harder to spot.
‘Usually if they are present on the eyelashes, we spot them by the “collarettes” they leave around the eyelashes,’ said Professor Sorcha Ni Dhubhghaill, chair of the ESCRS Cornea Committee, who was not involved in the research.
‘These are waxy rings made up of dead mites, mite faeces and mite eggs, mixed with skin and oil.
‘Since the adhesive used during eyelash extension procedures is applied near the base of the natural lashes, where collarettes are typically located, it could be much harder to spot them in women using eyelash extensions.’
Dr Zhmud said the latest findings highlight the importance of good hygiene, awareness of red flags and timely assessment when problems symptoms arise.
The expert recommended those who undergo extension treatments to clean eyelids twice a day with a gentle cleanser and lash brush.
Pricey menopause supplements marketed to mid-life women are at best useless and, at worst, delivering ‘potentially toxic’ ingredients, experts have warned.
Some products – that claim to reduce symptoms like hot flushes and brain fog – could put women at risk of vomiting, confusion and organ damage, if taken at high doses.
Meanwhile, roughly half of the supplements on the market do not contain nutrients that are proven to boost menopausal health, such as vitamin D and calcium, University College London (UCL) researchers found.
The team analysed the ingredients, doses and cost of more than 200 menopause supplements from nine major retailers.
They concluded that consumers are falling victim to a ‘menopause gold rush’, with women spending hundreds of pounds on products ‘not supported by scientific evidence’.
Poppy Sullivan, co-author of the research and menopause expert from UCL added: ‘Some nutrients can have adverse effects when consumed in excess over time.
‘For example, excessive vitamin D intake can theoretically lead to high calcium levels, which could cause adverse effects such as vomiting and confusion.
Menopause happens when a woman’s periods stop due to lower hormone levels
‘Certain botanical ingredients in some menopause supplements may also have risks.’
Ms Sullivan pointed specifically to a herb called black cohosh, which is said to be beneficial for night sweats but is ‘known to carry a potential risk of liver toxicity.’
The global market for menopause supplements is expected to surpass £18.4 million by 2030.
But experts warn that without better research and stricter regulations, women could be spending substantial amounts on dummy pills.
‘The menopause supplement market is growing rapidly, despite limited scientific evidence that many of these products improve menopause symptoms,’ Professor Joyce Harper, expert in women health and study lead author said.
‘Some social media influencers promote these products as effective solutions, despite many claims not being supported by scientific evidence.
‘This can contribute to the spread of misinformation and help drive a rapidly growing menopause supplement market, leading some women to spend substantial amounts of money on supplements.’
But, she added: ‘There is currently limited research available to substantiate the efficacy of many menopause-specific supplements.’
The menopause is when a woman’s periods stop due to lower hormone levels, usually between the ages of 45 and 55.
It is estimated that there are currently around 13 million perimenopausal or menopausal women in the UK.
Common physical symptoms experienced by some 80 per cent of women include hot flushes, palpitations and difficulty sleeping, and mental symptoms including brain fog and mood changes.
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) replaces the hormones oestrogen and progesterone, which fall to low levels as women approach the menopause
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the first line of treatment, but some women turn to supplements for added help with symptom management.
The British Menopause Society recommends a daily 10mcg or 400IU vitamin D supplement only for women of menopausal age.
The International Menopause Society states that adequate calcium is vital for the prevention of brittle bone condition osteoporosis, which is common post-menopause.
But the investigation found half the products analysed contained vitamin D, while less than a quarter included bone-boosting calcium.
Instead, most were found to contain herbs and plant compounds, such as red clover, which is said to mimic the effects of oestrogen in the body and ease symptoms.
The investigation also revealed a large discrepancy in cost, with prices ranging from as little as £1.50 to £95 per month.
Dr Anne-Marie Boylan, an expert in qualitative health research at the University of Oxford said: ‘For some women, ensuring a balanced diet may provide many of the vitamins and minerals found in menopause supplements.
‘Many ingredients in menopause supplements are also available in general multivitamins or herbal products not branded for menopause, which are often cheaper alternatives.
‘For symptoms affecting quality of life, the best option remains medical advice, though some women hesitate for fear of feeling dismissed by healthcare professionals.’
The researchers are now calling for more high-quality research into menopause supplements, including clinical trials, to determine which ingredients are effective and safe for menopausal women.
[noscript_1]
Waitrose has recalled batches of its Essential pitted black olives amid concerns the tubs could be contaminated with potentially deadly bacteria.
The premium supermarket said the olives may cause illness if consumed and urged customers not to eat them.
Food safety officials said Listeria monocytogenes ‘has been found in the product’.
Consuming the bacteria can trigger the infection listeriosis, which may lead to life-threatening complications such as sepsis or meningitis.
Symptoms can be similar to the flu, including a high temperature, muscle aches or pain, chills, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea.
However, in rare cases the infection can be more severe, causing serious complications such as meningitis.
The recall affects 120g packs of Waitrose Essential Pitted Black Olives, with use by dates of 13, 18 and September 27, 2026.
In a notice issued by the Food Standards Agency (FSA), Waitrose warned customers not to consume the olives – due to the potential presence of listeria.
Waitrose is recalling its black pitted olives amid fears they are contaminated with potentially deadly listeria
Instead affected products should be returned to your local Waitrose & Partners branch for a refund.
The supermarket apologised for any inconvenience caused.
Point-of-sale notices are being displayed in stores to alert customers to the recall.
Customers can also contact Waitrose Customer Care on 0800 188 884 (option four) for further information.
The FSA said recalls are issued when a product should not be sold because it may pose a risk to consumers.
Earlier this week, Sainsbury’s pulled its Inspired to Cook Pitted Black Olives from its shelves, over fears they may be contaminated with the same dangerous bacteria.
Some people, including those over 65, pregnant women, newborn babies, and people with weakened immune systems are more vulnerable to listeria infections.
When the infection spreads to the bloodstream and brain it can trigger sepsis or meningitis.
The bacteria is usually killed during pasteurisation, meaning it is commonly associated with raw dairy products as well as ready-to-eat foods such as deli meats, smoked fish and pre-packaged sandwiches.
Many foods can harbour the organism and contaminated produce may not look or smell spoiled.
UK Health Security Agency figures show 179 cases of listeriosis reported in England and Wales in 2024, with 28 deaths recorded among non-pregnancy-related cases.